Question:
> I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have > been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what > advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40? > Thanks > Tim
What kind of bears, blacks or big browns? I started out with a 9mm for protection from Colorado’s mountain lions and black bears, then switched to a .45. Both are OK for lions at close range but marginal at best for bears. A far, far better choice, IMHO, is a .44 Mag. I currently have a Ruger Super Redhawk with a 7-1/2" barrel and charge it with 240 grain JSP’s or XTP’s over 24.0 grains H110. They leave the barrel at 1529fps and are kind of obnoxious to shoot, but should be very effective. Even better would be Nosler Partition HG’s or Barnes XPB’s. If you live in an area where big browns are present, you might want to consider Ruger’s new .480 or even a .454. You can use .45 Colts in the .454 for reduced recoil practice, then step up to full-house .454 loads for the woods. You can pick up a new stainless Super Redhawk for under $500 at the Denver gun shows, Redhawks and Blackhawks for considerably less. My two cents. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
> I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have > been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what > advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40?
9mm = lots of rounds. .45 = big bullet. .40 = somewhere in between. If you want a much better compromise of the two, and recoil isn’t a problem, go for a 10mm – a plenty-powerful round. steve Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text —— Original Message —– Newsgroups: rec.hunting > I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have > been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what > advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40? > Thanks > Tim Tim, If you are looking for Bear ammo, stick to the .44 mag, or . 454 Casull chamberings. Al > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: > http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/ Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
> I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have > been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what > advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40?
Given $500 I wouldn’t pick any of the cartridges you mention. I’d buy a Ruger Blackhawk, Vaquero, or Bisley Vaquero in .44 magnum with a 4-3/4 inch barrel. Other choices might include a S&W M629 Mtn. Gun – likewise in .44 magnum, or the Taurus Tracker in .41 magnum (though I have not tried it). Problem is, none of these pistols are a first pick for a beginner’s handgun, especially with full power ammunition. OTOH If you’re just looking for an excuse to buy a Glock – and have larger than average hands – I suppose a case could be made for .45 ACP 230 grain +P loads being better than nothing, but that’s no beginner’s gun either. Good luck to you. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
> I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have > been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what > advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40? > Thanks > Tim
There is a revolver that would be well suited to your application. It would be the Taurus Titanium tracker in .41 magnum. It is an amazingly lightweight firearm yet powerful and versatile. Good luck, Rick Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
if you want to shoot bears. a .45 or .44 mag. 9mm lack power, ask the military . they would much rather have a .45. when you shoot something with a .45 it stays shot. large round, goes slow packs a PUNCH… LIKE A BIG TRUCK… ret’d USMC Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
If you went up against the bear with a 9mm you would just piss it off. Do youself a favor, for the few extra pnds get the 45 or 44 or the 41! Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40? Thanks Tim Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
> I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have > been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what > advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40? > Thanks > Tim
None of those calibers is even vaguely adequate for bears. Great for self defense if you’re worried about 2-legged critters. Dogs. Rabid small critters. But absolutely not bears. For bears, look at a .41 or .44 mag or .454 Casull. If you’re a handloader, the .45 Colt can be warmed up a little in the right heavy framed handgun, but I’ve not seen an adequate factory load yet. If you insist on a semi-auto (mistake, in my opinion) you might consider a desert eagle .44 or .50 AE, or a LAR Grizzly in .45 Winchester Mag. Basically, you need 200+ grains of lead, not smaller than .40 caliber, fired at not less than 1200 fps. That elminates conventional, common semiauto pistol cartridges. That’s also absolutely minimal; I’d feel a lot better with a .429" bullet of 250 grains weight starting at 1350 fps, though even that isn’t absolutely decisive … it takes some precision shooting to make it effective. Tom Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
> I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have > been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what > advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40?
You need the one you can easily file the front sight off of because it won’t hurt so much when the bear shoves it up your …. before he eats you.
If you want a more serious response, see Tom Rutledge’s — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
: I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a : light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the : wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have : been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what : advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40? : Thanks : Tim If you’re insisting on an autoloader and it *has* to be compact and light, you might want to look into a Glock 20 (10mm). It’s going to be marginal at best, but if you load it up with full power 10mm rounds you’ll be better off with that than any of the calibers you mentioned. Personally, I’d go with a bigger revolver. Steve Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
> I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness. I don’t want to spend more than about $500 dollars. I have > been looking around and Glocks seem to be a reasonable fit. So, what > advantages are there to 9mm vs. .45 vs .40? > Thanks > Tim
Keep in mind that in the late 19th century, Wild Bill Hickock used to hunt bear with a pair of Colt 1851 cap and ball black powder revolvers in .36 caliber. He also used dogs so it was easier to walk up to the bear and put a round in its ear. Those guns had the ballistics of a .32 caliber semi auto. Decades later, the .44 magnum was touted as the ideal bear load. Now it’s the 454 Casull. I hear people speak highly of shotguns with slugs. Whatever. Still seems whatever you’re armed with is better than what you left at home. Just pay your money and take your chances. -Norm Balog, D.O. NRA pistol instructor, iconoclast, physician Occupied Maryland Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response:
> I am nothing of a gun aficiondo so I need some help here. Ideally I want a > light, compact handgun for protection from critters (bears) out in the > wilderness.
<snip> If you are going to be using it against bears, out of the three that you mentioned the .45 ACP would be the only one that I’d even consider marginal. The 9mm and .40 S&W simply don’t have enough energy and penetration to reliably do anything other than make a bear mad. With a bit of luck, and an accurate, well placed shot, they might work, but they might not. If you are really serious about critter protection, go for a double-action revolver in .357 Magnum or .44 Magnum. The revolver has fewer moving parts, meaning fewer things to fail while tromping around in the backcountry. Both the .357 and .44 have far better penetration vs. the .45, which you’ll need against a bear. A good, new revolver will cost you +/- $500, depending on what you get. Quality used revolvers abound, all you have to do is look around a little and you should be able to get a good quality used revolver for around $350. HTH Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Response: