Category: Shotgun Hunting

Mossberg 835 UltiMag Slug Barrel: Problems?

Question:

Howdy!  I got a rifled slug barrel with open sights for my 12 gauge Mossberg 835.  I took it to the rifle range and it seemed to shoot to the right and down from where you are aiming (target bullseye).  The gunshop put another back sight on it; however, there was not much improvement.  Has anyone had any similar problems?  Any suggestions for fixing it?  I would appreciate your views. Always, Gene Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Howdy! I got a rifled slug barrel with open sights for my 12 gauge Mossberg 835. I took it to the rifle range and it seemed to shoot to the right and down from where you are aiming (target bullseye). The gunshop put another back sight on it; however, there was not much improvement. Has anyone had any similar problems? Any suggestions for fixing it? Question:  When you are at the range (I assume to sight it in) and you shoot from a benchrest/sandbags, how are you holding the shotgun? Something my cousin learned by "mistake" last year with is slug-gun is this:  You CANNOT shoot from a rest/sandbag with a slug gun the same way you do with a rifle…..it will screw you up every time.  With a rifle, you do not touch the forearm at all….just leave the sandbag to support it.  Here’s where it gets tricky….if you do this with a slug-gun, the POI will be WAY off.  IIRC, a rifle has more of a "backward thrust" recoil vs. the shotguns "lifting" recoil (or is it the other way around???). Anyways, he was having FITS trying to get it to hit where he wanted.  He got frustrated and took it to the shop and told them "fix it, or replace it."  The shop owner was very nice.  He told him he would be happy to replace the gun if it was defective…..but first he wanted my cousin to shoot it just one more time – HIS way.  He told him to forget the benchrest rifle shooting technique…..and support the shotguns forearm by holding it as he would in the field (he COULD rest his HAND on the sandbag…..but the forearm should be in his hand).  Believe it or not, his accuracy problems cleared right up. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Scope Base Question

Question:

Greetings;         First, I want to thank all those who have helped me identify the parts I need to outfit my shotgun with a scope.  Your information has been a tremendous help!         Second, I took 2 pictures of the base on my shotgun.  It was put on by a dealer.  I now need to know what kind it is and what kind of rings and so forth I need to get to get it ready for hunting.  If it helps, there is the number "62" printed on it.  I discovered we cannot post pictures to this newsgroup, so I uploaded them to my company’s web site for viewing.  I guess being the company’s webmaster can come in handy.  :)  Just click and check out the pics. http://www.jobsourceonline.org/base1.jpg     and http://www.jobsourceonline.org/base2.jpg   Respond here or to my — Thank-you, James Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Jim, As suspected, it is a Weaver base. You will need Weaver style rings. Good Luck, Bandit – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Greetings; >         First, I want to thank all those who have helped me identify the > parts I need to outfit my shotgun with a scope.  Your information has > been a tremendous help! >         Second, I took 2 pictures of the base on my shotgun.  It was put > on by a dealer.  I now need to know what kind it is and what kind of > rings and so forth I need to get to get it ready for hunting.  If it > helps, there is the number "62" printed on it.  I discovered we cannot > post pictures to this newsgroup, so I uploaded them to my company’s web > site for viewing.  I guess being the company’s webmaster can come in > handy.  :)  Just click and check out the pics. > http://www.jobsourceonline.org/base1.jpg     and > http://www.jobsourceonline.org/base2.jpg   Respond here or to my > — > Thank-you, > James > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

EAA / Baikal MP 153 12Ga. semi-auto any good..??

Question:

The design is not bad, but Izh-Mash seems to always have some kind of manufacturing and quality control problems. So if it’s made by IMZ, look really close at the gun before you part with your cash. If it’s made by EAA – then I don’t have any comments, except they sell at 10 times over IMZ’s MSRP. Yev _____ Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I am looking for an inexpensive 12Ga semi-auto shotgun, capable of shooting 3 1/2" shells.  This gun seems to fit all my needs, but I have never seen one, or heard anything about them.  Are they reliable?  Will it perform OK for a beginner duck/goose hunter?  It claims to be able to shoot anything from 2 3/4", 3", or 3 1/2"  due to its auto gas adjustment valve.  Any feedback on this gun is much appreciated, thanks, Matt in MI Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Slug gun scope?

Question:

I am looking to improve my effective range with my deer gun by putting a scope on my 870. (Please spare me the lectures about practice. I’m practicing so much I’m bruised!) I am looking for something mid-priced, probably available at Wal-Mart or such. Any informed suggestions? Thanks in advance. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>I am looking to improve my effective range with my deer gun by putting a scope >on my 870. (Please spare me the lectures about practice. I’m practicing so much >I’m bruised!) I am looking for something mid-priced, probably available at >Wal-Mart or such. Any informed suggestions? Thanks in advance.

IMHO: Don’t bother with receiver mounted scope systems. I tried in vain to get my 870 to be consistent with a Square-D or B or something receiver mount. Changed scopes, changed barrels, changed ammo (tried every available slug and load combination I could find) no luck at all. The 870 barrel to receiver interface is just too sloppy for these mountings to work consistently. I know some folks have had good luck with them but here in the N.E. with the temperature variations we get the interface is just too unstable. If you are going with a scope on the 870 (the best option for aging, bifocal-outfitted eyes:) try one of the cantilever mounts. They are not too stable either but with care they will make it through a couple of trips out. Low end scopes are not worth it in my book. I picked up a nice shotgun scope for about $230. Seemed obnoxious considering I could have picked up a nikon 3×9 for about the same price. I have a Bushnell trophy shotgun scope on one of my shotguns. It’s okay until it rains or snows and the thing fogs up. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

My father has a modern 870 that we had drilled for a scope.  We have fiddled and farted with that setup numerous times over the past 3 years with somewhat limited success.  I have come to the conclusion that removable barrels and reciever mounted scopes just dont work (at least with 870s).  I believe they make a cantilever barrel and I would recommend it if you can afford it. I use a tasco 1.75-5 x 20 on my mosberg 500.  It has treated me well but does fog up a bit more than the real expensive scopes I have used. Basically you want a scope with good eye relief (so you dont pop yourself)and a wide field of view.  hotguMagnification is generally not very important since 200 yard shots are out of the question with a shotgun.  I hunt in some thick stuff and I find the scope really helps me avoid the saplings.  You know, you pull the trigger on a buck 30yds in front of you only to have a sapling fall over and the buck disappear. My setup is a dedicated slug barrel with the cantilever mount.  Every year I break it down and put on a turkey barrel and every year when I stick the slug barrel back on my first shot is "in the black".   I believe I paid $100 or less for the scope and $250 for the gun with both barrels back when I was a poor schlep working at walmart.  Now, even though I have some cash, I refuse to give up this setup.  It aint pretty and its a little heavy but it sure works. Good Luck Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Try looking at a Bushnell Holo scope– I seen one put on Marlin 512 slugmaster one nice set up— and very acurate. I have a 870, use to have a scope on it.  Never could make it acurate enough at the range to satisfy me.  So I would not even take it out.  Threw the scope off and went back to open sights. I am serious looking at the Marlin 512 and the holo scope set up. Good Luck. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Ditch the scope! I tried for 3 years to use a Winchester 1200 w. a Tasco Bantam on a B-Square mount. I shot two does with it, and mortally wounded a nice buck which I never found (still feel ill!). Problem with the scope was on a running shot, I could never get the scope to my eye, keep the deer in view, and manage to place a decent kill shot (the does were both close shots, with some dumb luck!) The scope shot well at 25 and 50 yds., but a bench at the range is a far cry from a moving deer in the woods. Last year, I removed the scope and installed Tru-Glo fiber optic sights. WOW! Same accuracy, and I can use both eyes to watch the target. My right eye is not good, so lining up a bright red dot in between 2 bright green dots is MUCH easier then acquiring the target through a lens that might be foggy/wet. The sights are also much more forgiving in low light shooting. Plus, I don’t have the scope up top and I’m not worried about banging it around. Took a bit of gunsmithing to get the sights installed, but well worth it! For close shots (25-50 yds.), I wouldn’t bother with a shotgun scope for slugs. > I am looking to improve my effective range with my deer gun by putting a scope > on my 870. (Please spare me the lectures about practice. I’m practicing so much > I’m bruised!) I am looking for something mid-priced, probably available at > Wal-Mart or such. Any informed suggestions? Thanks in advance. > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Amen. A scope is a waste of effort if you have decent iron sights. Randy Wakeman Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> Amen. A scope is a waste of effort if you have decent iron sights. > Randy Wakeman

Eh, to each his own. Every gun that I own has a scope on it. The slug guns are tack drivers. And yes, I can get on a moving deer, give it the proper lead and kill it. WW Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>Amen. A scope is a waste of effort if you have decent iron sights. >Randy Wakeman

Unless you have 50 year old near sighted eyes that can’t focus on the sites without reading glasses. FYI- using reading glasses to see the sites results in the target being a blurred mass. Never had a problem until I hit 47, now a scope is a ‘must’. Using a 2x scope on a shotgun isn’t a bad thing. I save my running shot wing-shooting for the bird hunts anyway. Here in CT there is amble opportunity for a steady shot at whitetails. Wing shooting here is damn dangerous with the population density we have. Ya never know when you’ll see a mountain biker or hiker pop in unexpectedly. Even on private land. Can’t speak for hunting in other areas but running shots with slugs around here are a bad idea in general. Not condemning them, mind you. Just not appropriate around here. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> Amen. A scope is a waste of effort if you have decent iron sights. > Randy Wakeman > Eh, to each his own. Every gun that I own has a scope on it. The slug guns > are tack drivers. > And yes, I can get on a moving deer, give it the proper lead and kill it.

Clarification – I don’t shoot at running deer unless they are already wounded. By "moving deer" I mean deer that are walking. WW Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> A scope is a waste of effort if you have decent iron sights.

Obviously written by an inexperienced shooter with good eyesight. Many thousands of deer hunters can’t see iron sights well enough to shoot acurately, expecially in poor light.  Even hunters with good eyes will see improved field accuracy with a low powered scope in dark conditions.  If iron sights were really a "waste of time", why are scopes so widely used on general hunting rifles?  ;^) Jay T Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I say if someone condemns shotgun scopes it’s because they are using a cheap scope on one seriously hard kicking firearm. A shotgun needs a quality scope (Leupold, Pentax Lightseeker, etc) and needs to be canteleiver mounted. This BSquare crap with a Tasco just isn’t going to cut it. I’d rather have iron sights than that any day! Plus, to really tap into rifled barrel/sabots performance, you need a scope. Iron sights will take you out to about 50 yards nicely, but 50-125 needs a scope to be a tackdriver . . .no matter how good your eyes are. Stillhunter Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>Iron sights will take you out to about 50 yards nicely, but 50-125 >needs a scope to be a tackdriver . . .no matter how good your eyes are.

Sub 1-1/2" groups at 100 yards again and again w/ my Browning A-Bolt using Win / BRI 2-3/4" sabots, factory iron sights. That equals dead buck- no, my eyes are not that good, and I’m not a world-class shot. And, I’m not getting any younger! Randy Wakeman Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> >Iron sights will take you out to about 50 yards nicely, but 50-125 >needs a scope to be a tackdriver . . .no matter how good your eyes are. > Sub 1-1/2" groups at 100 yards again and again w/ my Browning A-Bolt using Win > / BRI 2-3/4" sabots, factory iron sights. > That equals dead buck- no, my eyes are not that good, and I’m not a world-class > shot. And, I’m not getting any younger!

Well, anything is possible. I’d love to see you do this at a range . . . . Not doubting you, I just love to watch good shooting. jg Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> >Iron sights will take you out to about 50 yards nicely, but 50-125 > >needs a scope to be a tackdriver . . .no matter how good your eyes are. > Sub 1-1/2" groups at 100 yards again and again w/ my Browning A-Bolt using Win > / BRI 2-3/4" sabots, factory iron sights. > That equals dead buck- no, my eyes are not that good, and I’m not a > world-class > shot. And, I’m not getting any younger! > Well, anything is possible. I’d love to see you do this at a range . . . . > Not doubting you, I just love to watch good shooting.

Let me know when this happens. I’d like to sell tickets and have concesion rights. ;-) WW Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Stopping Rust on an old shotgun

Question:

  Since I can’t see the actual gun, I’d take it to a gunsmith and explain the problem the same way you’ve explained it here. Most gunsmiths will give advice for free. If it’s a rare or valueable gun, they’ll probably advise to do nothing but keep it oiled. If it’s value is only sentimental, then I’d try light rubbing with OOOO steelwool and light oil, such as three in one. This will remove loose rust without damaging remaining finish. The stock is probably grubby too, so go at it gently with some furniture polish cleaner and a toothbrush, followed by waxing with some paste wax.   The gunsmith may be able to replace the firing pin for a small cost. If he can’t get the part, try a web search for Numrich Arms, they carry lots of obsolete gunparts. Matt > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Hi.  I’m new to the list, so be kind!  Anyway, My husband killed his first deer at age 12 with an old double barrel shotgun that was in the house at least back to the 1920s.  The family didn’t take good care of the outside, just cleaned the barrels so it would shoot.  The outside looks awful and is badly pitted- the blue-color that I’m sure it used to have is long gone. We’re short on extra cash so what could I do, here at home, to stop it from rusting any further and to possibly begin to clean it up beyond the rust. They don’t even know what make the thing is due to the rust.  It’s a 12 gauge double barrel and one firing pin is worn out because that’s where he put his other shell when he’d go hunting.  He used it three years in a row until he saved up for a new one and I want to save this gun to give back to him as a gift.  Any ideas are greatfully appreciated. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> Hi.  I’m new to the list, so be kind!  Anyway, My husband killed his first > deer at age 12 with an old double barrel shotgun that was in the house at > least back to the 1920s.  The family didn’t take good care of the outside, > just cleaned the barrels so it would shoot.  The outside looks awful and is > badly pitted- the blue-color that I’m sure it used to have is long gone. > We’re short on extra cash so what could I do, here at home, to stop it from > rusting any further and to possibly begin to clean it up beyond the rust. > They don’t even know what make the thing is due to the rust.  It’s a 12 > gauge double barrel and one firing pin is worn out because that’s where he > put his other shell when he’d go hunting.  He used it three years in a row > until he saved up for a new one and I want to save this gun to give back to > him as a gift.  Any ideas are greatfully appreciated.

You may want to just leave it as it is.  With deeply pitted steel, nothing will ever make it beautiful again.  Hang it on the wall as a rustic conversation piece. That said, you could always try Naval Jelly.  It is a phosphate acid that reduces rust back to metal.  Degrease the gun thoroughly using acetone, then apply Naval Jelly according to the directions.  It won’t put the metal back in the pits, but it will recover whatever is left.  Then you could take fine emery cloth, polish all the pits out, and have it re blued.  That would probably take hundreds of hours of work. If you just want to lean it by the back door and use it for a house gun, apply the Naval Jelly, take it to a gunsmith for repairs as needed, then give it a coat of rattle can.  A nice camo finish would be pretty mod. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

sabot recommendation for rem 870

Question:

The 870 is probably one of the less accurate rifled slug guns, even with sabots.  The bolt action guns and the rifled single shots (H&R Ultra Slug Hunter) are much better in the accuracy department.   I also have a personal preference for the 20 gauge: plenty of killing power without all the recoil. If you really want the feel of a rifle, get an H&R Ultra Slug Hunter or get the 20 gauge rifled barrel on a TC Encore.  These are rifled slug guns built on single shot rifle actions.  1-2" accuracy at 100 yards is common.  You can also have the triggers in these guns worked to a crisp 2-3 lbs.  Much nicer than the 870 trigger. Accuracy is a crap shoot in the 870, and you’ll have to try several brands to find one that shoots well.  Being that you want to extend the range a bit, you should try the Hornady H2K slug and the Winchester Partion Gold. Both have higher than normal velocities for a flatter trajectory.  The Remington Copper Solid sabot load has given me good accuracy in some slug guns, as has the Lightfield. Michael Courtney Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Dean, I have had very good luck with Lightfield Hybrid slugs. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text —— Original Message —– Newsgroups: rec.hunting Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:49 PM > Just purchased a new Remington 870 slug gun (has rifled barrel) and would > like to hear your recommendation for which brand of sabot to shoot in it. > I’ve learned from shooting magnum rifles that different ammo brands shoot > differently so i’m assuming the same holds true for sabots. > I’ll be hunting whitetail deer.  my major concern it tight groups at over > 100 yards.  I would like to be able to get a heart shot at 125 yards and > even to 150 yards if there is enough energy and accuracy in the sabot to get > a one shot kill. > I’ve hunted for years with magnum rifles shooting out to 400 yards.  where i > live now i’m restricted to shotguns so the only way i can get that rifle > feeling is by putting a scope on my 870 slug gun.  I like one shot kills and > am a firm believer in shot placement.  this is the first time that i’m a > better shot than my weapon is capable of delivering so i’m looking to tune > it to the ammo as much as possible.  I’ll be hunting over fields with ranges > out to 300 yards.  i’ve heard of people shooting out to 150 yards. > thanks, > Dean > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/ Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Just purchased a new Remington 870 slug gun (has rifled barrel) and would like to hear your recommendation for which brand of sabot to shoot in it. I’ve learned from shooting magnum rifles that different ammo brands shoot differently so i’m assuming the same holds true for sabots. I’ll be hunting whitetail deer.  my major concern it tight groups at over 100 yards.  I would like to be able to get a heart shot at 125 yards and even to 150 yards if there is enough energy and accuracy in the sabot to get a one shot kill. I’ve hunted for years with magnum rifles shooting out to 400 yards.  where i live now i’m restricted to shotguns so the only way i can get that rifle feeling is by putting a scope on my 870 slug gun.  I like one shot kills and am a firm believer in shot placement.  this is the first time that i’m a better shot than my weapon is capable of delivering so i’m looking to tune it to the ammo as much as possible.  I’ll be hunting over fields with ranges out to 300 yards.  i’ve heard of people shooting out to 150 yards. thanks, Dean Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>Just purchased a new Remington 870 slug gun (has rifled barrel) and would >like to hear your recommendation for which brand of sabot to shoot in it. >I’ve learned from shooting magnum rifles that different ammo brands shoot >differently so i’m assuming the same holds true for sabots.

After several years of sighting in my 870 prior to shotgun season, I’ve shot just about evey sabot out there through it and the Lightfields have consistently given me the tightest patterns (3 touching holes at 50 yds last year, and I am using the iron sights, not a scope).  I haven’t tried to pattern it out farther than that because on the land I hunt, 50 yards is about as long a shot as you can responsibly take anyways.  This year I might sight it in for 100 yards, just for shits and giggles to see how well it reaches out there. Tim Freedom of the Press DOES NOT mean the right to lie!! Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> Just purchased a new Remington 870 slug gun (has rifled barrel) and would > like to hear your recommendation for which brand of sabot to shoot in it.

Personally, I would avoid the Remington Copper Solid Sabots for two reasons.  Remington has a habit of redesigning these slugs without indicating that they have been redesigned, and their flight characteristics vary with each re-design.  Secondly, they do not seem to expand well and only punch a pinky size hole in the deer, which in many cases allows the animal to run far with very little blood to follow. > I’ve learned from shooting magnum rifles that different ammo brands shoot > differently so i’m assuming the same holds true for sabots.

You bet your sweet bippie. > I’ll be hunting whitetail deer.  my major concern it tight groups at over > 100 yards.  I would like to be able to get a heart shot at 125 yards and > even to 150 yards if there is enough energy and accuracy in the sabot to get > a one shot kill.

I think you’re dreaming.  The sabots I’ve used fall rapidly after 100 yards.  I’d recommend Lightfield Sabots.  They seem accurate, repeatable and punch a hole the size of your thumb.  But they drop about 6 inches at 100 yards when zeroed in at 50 yards and probably hit the dirt before 150 yards. Lena Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

 Accuracy is a crap shoot in the 870, and you’ll have to try several brands > to find one that shoots well.  Being that you want to extend the range a > bit, you should try the Hornady H2K slug and the Winchester Partion Gold. > Both have higher than normal velocities for a flatter trajectory.  The > Remington Copper Solid sabot load has given me good accuracy in some slug > guns, as has the Lightfield. > Michael Courtney

I second the 870 crap shoot concept. I gave up on mine as a slug gun. The barrel simply moves around in the receiver too much. Oh well. It’s a great bird gun but that’s about it. Last year I picked up my second Mossburg bolt action 12ga. (model 390 i think…) Rifled barrel, ported, scopes mount without a problem. Great groups out to 75+yds. Sweet little gun. Only problem is the safety is difficult to get to when a scope is mounted close to the barrel. Minor issue in my opinion for a gun priced just over 230 at Walmart. Remington Copper Solids seem to work out fine. I purchased a Mossberg 695 bolt-action about 4 years ago and have killed numerous deer with is since.  I have a Pentax 2×8x30 scope on it and can shoot 1.5" groups at 100 yards using Federal Premium Sabot Slugs, and I don’t consider myself a very good shot.  For the money, you’ll have a hard time beating the 695, but I’ll warn  you in advance, it kicks really good :) The Barnes X-pander bullets are deadly by the way. Jim Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Tim said – {"Just one thing about the 870 and consistant accurace with slugs.  Since the 870 has a loose fit in the receiver  as others have mentioned, a receiver mounted scope will not work, however, if you get a cantilever scope mount barrel for the gun, that problem goes away, since the scope is sighted to the barrel. Probably not an option as they cost an addtional $175.00 or so.  You are probably better off with a different gun if you need to scope it.  Like I said, where I hunt, you really can’t take a shot longer than 50 yds so I don’t need a scope, and I love the way the 870 feels." Woody say – - If you have an 870 with a ventilated rib on it you can intall a cantilever on it for about $50. Remington makes them and sells them.They fasten right onto the rib with a couple of set screws. You can take the cantilever/scope off and put it back on with it coming pretty close back to zero. Screw yourself in a rifled choke and you off to the races…. er, I mean off to the hunt. Woody Williams If you’re too busy to hunt, you’re too busy Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>Tim, thanks for the response.  Please let me know how your 100 yard effort >goes. >I purchased my son a 870 slug gun and I was going buy one myself… however >my neighbor purchased a Marlin model 512P Slugmaster that I really like the >looks of.  It uses a bolt action and does not allow the barrel to be >removed… which should improve the accuracy… since the receiver and >barrel are integrated together (unlike the 870) it should shoot consistently >better with a scope.  However, I just don’t like marlins much so I’m >hesitant.  In fact, I’m fixing to post something on the newsgroup again to >ask others what they think.  Thanks again… >Dean

Just one thing about the 870 and consistant accurace with slugs.  Since the 870 has a loose fit in the receiver  as others have mentioned, a receiver mounted scope will not work, however, if you get a cantilever scope mount barrel for the gun, that problem goes away, since the scope is sighted to the barrel. Probably not an option as they cost an addtional $175.00 or so.  You are probably better off with a different gun if you need to scope it.  Like I said, where I hunt, you really can’t take a shot longer than 50 yds so I don’t need a scope, and I love the way the 870 feels. Tim Freedom of the Press DOES NOT mean the right to lie!! Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Thanks for the response… I purchased the 870 for my son and I was going to buy one myself but am now considering a bolt action.  He’ll get a different barrel and use is as a bird gun also, but since I already have a shotgun I’m looking for a slug gun only setup.   I have a budget of $350.  My neighbor purchased a Marlin 512P Slugmaster which I really like the feel of but I’ve never even thought of Marlin as a gun I would own… always thought of them as cheap.  Any experience with this one?  I’ll research the H&R… any idea what it cost? Thanks again! Dean

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> The 870 is probably one of the less accurate rifled slug guns, even with > sabots.  The bolt action guns and the rifled single shots (H&R Ultra Slug > Hunter) are much better in the accuracy department.   I also have a personal > preference for the 20 gauge: plenty of killing power without all the recoil. > If you really want the feel of a rifle, get an H&R Ultra Slug Hunter or get > the 20 gauge rifled barrel on a TC Encore.  These are rifled slug guns built > on single shot rifle actions.  1-2" accuracy at 100 yards is common.  You > can also have the triggers in these guns worked to a crisp 2-3 lbs.  Much > nicer than the 870 trigger. > Accuracy is a crap shoot in the 870, and you’ll have to try several brands > to find one that shoots well.  Being that you want to extend the range a > bit, you should try the Hornady H2K slug and the Winchester Partion Gold. > Both have higher than normal velocities for a flatter trajectory.  The > Remington Copper Solid sabot load has given me good accuracy in some slug > guns, as has the Lightfield. > Michael Courtney > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

My neighbor purchased a Marlin 512P Slugmaster which I really like the feel of but I’ve never even thought of Marlin as a gun I would own… always thought of them as cheap. Marlin is a fine gun company, i wouldn’t hesitate to buy one of their products…..just my 2 cents. Bill Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Tim, thanks for the response.  Please let me know how your 100 yard effort goes. I purchased my son a 870 slug gun and I was going buy one myself… however my neighbor purchased a Marlin model 512P Slugmaster that I really like the looks of.  It uses a bolt action and does not allow the barrel to be removed… which should improve the accuracy… since the receiver and barrel are integrated together (unlike the 870) it should shoot consistently better with a scope.  However, I just don’t like marlins much so I’m hesitant.  In fact, I’m fixing to post something on the newsgroup again to ask others what they think.  Thanks again… Dean

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Just purchased a new Remington 870 slug gun (has rifled barrel) and would >like to hear your recommendation for which brand of sabot to shoot in it. >I’ve learned from shooting magnum rifles that different ammo brands shoot >differently so i’m assuming the same holds true for sabots. > After several years of sighting in my 870 prior to shotgun season, I’ve shot > just about evey sabot out there through it and the Lightfields have > consistently given me the tightest patterns (3 touching holes at 50 yds last > year, and I am using the iron sights, not a scope).  I haven’t tried to pattern > it out farther than that because on the land I hunt, 50 yards is about as long > a shot as you can responsibly take anyways.  This year I might sight it in for > 100 yards, just for shits and giggles to see how well it reaches out there. > Tim > Freedom of the Press DOES NOT mean the right to lie!! > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Thanks for the response… I purchased the 870 for my son and I was going to >buy one myself but am now considering a bolt action.  He’ll get a different >barrel and use is as a bird gun also, but since I already have a shotgun I’m >looking for a slug gun only setup.   I have a budget of $350.  My neighbor >purchased a Marlin 512P Slugmaster which I really like the feel of but I’ve >never even thought of Marlin as a gun I would own… always thought of them >as cheap.  Any experience with this one?  I’ll research the H&R… any idea >what it cost? >Thanks again! >Dean > The 870 is probably one of the less accurate rifled slug guns, even with > sabots.  The bolt action guns and the rifled single shots (H&R Ultra Slug > Hunter) are much better in the accuracy department.   I also have a >personal > preference for the 20 gauge: plenty of killing power without all the >recoil. > If you really want the feel of a rifle, get an H&R Ultra Slug Hunter or >get > the 20 gauge rifled barrel on a TC Encore.  These are rifled slug guns >built > on single shot rifle actions.  1-2" accuracy at 100 yards is common.  You > can also have the triggers in these guns worked to a crisp 2-3 lbs.  Much > nicer than the 870 trigger. > Accuracy is a crap shoot in the 870, and you’ll have to try several brands > to find one that shoots well.  Being that you want to extend the range a > bit, you should try the Hornady H2K slug and the Winchester Partion Gold. > Both have higher than normal velocities for a flatter trajectory.  The > Remington Copper Solid sabot load has given me good accuracy in some slug > guns, as has the Lightfield. > Michael Courtney

I second the 870 crap shoot concept. I gave up on mine as a slug gun. The barrel simply moves around in the receiver too much. Oh well. It’s a great bird gun but that’s about it. Last year I picked up my second Mossburg bolt action 12ga. (model 390 i think…) Rifled barrel, ported, scopes mount without a problem. Great groups out to 75+yds. Sweet little gun. Only problem is the safety is difficult to get to when a scope is mounted close to the barrel. Minor issue in my opinion for a gun priced just over 230 at Walmart. Remington Copper Solids seem to work out fine. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

looking for an over/under

Question:

I would like to purchase an over under shotgun.  SSK or comparable with the fancy silver and gold. Buck Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I have a beautiful Classic Doubles 101 with high grade wood but it has blue receiver.  20 ga, tubes in 99.9% condition. Chester – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text —— Original Message —– Newsgroups: rec.hunting Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 5:20 PM > I would like to purchase an over under shotgun.  SSK or comparable with the > fancy silver and gold. > Buck > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/ Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Legal vs Ethical Discussion

Question:

> Jeepers said – - > "For this reason I don’t think I’d enjoy hunting caribou. It just sounds to > much like an expensive easy shoot." > WW says – That depends. If one limited himself/herself to the type of weapon, > say a bow or muzzleloader then that would swing the odds more in the caribou’s > favor.

Agreed, but then I was responding to the description given. > THEN – If you said to yourself," I’m not killing anything but a B & C > caribou.Whoa! The challenge stiffens up quite a bit.

Agreed, but to find that B & C caribou from the air also changes the challenge of it. > You get the idea. Even in the land of plenty a person can set their limits as > to what they will shoot with what and how. That’s exactly how I hunt deer in > Indiana. We have enough deer that if I wanted it wouldn’t be a matter of IF I > get a deer, but what deer would I want to take.I can kill a deer just about > everytime I go hunting, but I can’t kill a P & Y everytime. Heck, not even > once a year, unless I’m damn good and lucky. > Jeepers said – "A while back my father went dove hunting in Mexico, his buddy > ruined an expensive shotgun shooting too many very abundant birds. Easy and > wasteful." > WW says – I think your friend is exagerating. I’d say his father screwed his > gun up some other way than frequent shooting.

I wasn’t there. This was what I was told in the ’80’s. I was also told the shotgun (a baretta, I believe) was discarded because he had extras. The wealthy can do that. I cannot, my ol’ Remington 870 is cherished and cared for, as it was given to me and is a good tool. > Jeepers said – "As for the caribou, first I’d like to taste the meat to see if > it suits my palate."

I doubt I would not like it. I haven’t eaten any venison so far I did not like, we almost exclusively eat venison (wild deer, wild pig, quail & dove). I raise cattle, but I prefer deer. > WW – You only hunt what you eat? No predator hunting? BTW – caribou is > excellent.

Correct, I only "hunt" what I will eat. Coyotes and feral dogs get shot automatically within sight of my home, they are not hunted, they are not stalked or baited or spotlighted, they are "shot". When I "hunt" I enjoy the use of all my senses to find the game. I do not enjoy the methods of others, like sitting in a cozy carpeted warm blind reading a book waiting for a deer to appear at the feeder. I don’t condemn it, I just don’t prefer it. Maybe when I get too old to stalk I will prefer it. > Jeepers said – " Then I would need to see if the tundra is a place I would > enjoy." > WW – It’s a wonderful place. It beats New York City three ways to Sunday.

I wouldn’t know, I live in the country, all cities suck. I live in South Texas, we never see snow and frankly I’m not too keen on it either. I don’t enjoy vast open spaces like the treeless plains farmland of North Texas, so maybe I wouldn’t enjoy the tundra. But I shure wouldn’t mind the ride over it in a helocopter! > Jeepers said- "If it were a free hunt, paid for by someone else, perhaps then > yes I probably would. But if I were paying for it out of my wallet, I think I > would enjoy more of a challenge, perhaps something where the risk of coming > home empty handed was a real possibility. A good time does not necessarily > mean a sure thing kill. Hell, just going to the tundra might be a thrill for > me, I guess. In the end I don’t really know what I would do, honest." > WW- Again, the challenge is in what you hunt and with what tool. That is the > beauty of hunting in that, for the most part, you can set your own limits and > "challenges."

Agreed. > Woody Williams

– http://Sprite.viptx.net/~moomesa/index.html Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Jeepers said – - "For this reason I don’t think I’d enjoy hunting caribou. It just sounds to much like an expensive easy shoot." WW says – That depends. If one limited himself/herself to the type of weapon, say a bow or muzzleloader then that would swing the odds more in the caribou’s favor. THEN – If you said to yourself," I’m not killing anything but a B & C caribou.Whoa! The challenge stiffens up quite a bit. You get the idea. Even in the land of plenty a person can set their limits as to what they will shoot with what and how. That’s exactly how I hunt deer in Indiana. We have enough deer that if I wanted it wouldn’t be a matter of IF I get a deer, but what deer would I want to take.I can kill a deer just about everytime I go hunting, but I can’t kill a P & Y everytime. Heck, not even once a year, unless I’m damn good and lucky. Jeepers said – "A while back my father went dove hunting in Mexico, his buddy ruined an expensive shotgun shooting too many very abundant birds. Easy and wasteful." WW says – I think your friend is exagerating. I’d say his father screwed his gun up some other way than frequent shooting. Jeepers said – "As for the caribou, first I’d like to taste the meat to see if it suits my palate." WW – You only hunt what you eat? No predator hunting? BTW – caribou is excellent. Jeepers said – " Then I would need to see if the tundra is a place I would enjoy." WW – It’s a wonderful place. It beats New York City three ways to Sunday. Jeepers said- "If it were a free hunt, paid for by someone else, perhaps then yes I probably would. But if I were paying for it out of my wallet, I think I would enjoy more of a challenge, perhaps something where the risk of coming home empty handed was a real possibility. A good time does not necessarily mean a sure thing kill. Hell, just going to the tundra might be a thrill for me, I guess. In the end I don’t really know what I would do, honest." WW- Again, the challenge is in what you hunt and with what tool. That is the beauty of hunting in that, for the most part, you can set your own limits and "challenges." Woody Williams Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

browning or benelli 3.5 inch

Question:

anyone got any opinions or comments on the browning gold hunter 3 1/2 inch 12 gauge or the super black eagle benelli. i am thinking of up grading my shotgun and can not decide.  i’ve shot the benelli but i have not shot the browning. thanks Jamie Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> anyone got any opinions or comments on the browning gold hunter 3 1/2 inch > 12 gauge or the super black eagle benelli. > i am thinking of up grading my shotgun and can not decide.  i’ve shot the > benelli but i have not shot the browning. > thanks

In a word…Benelli. But I have never been one to confine myself to just one word…so here goes…  Have you looked at the AL 391?  In my opinion, the cost factor aside, the Berretta AL 391 is superior to both.  If you need a 3.5 inch then it’s not an option, but why would you ned that additional half inch?  What is the difference at the muzzle?  Is it worth the lost performance in the gun? Before I get flamed on this one…I like all three guns.  If the price was not an issue for me, I’d have bought a Benelli and used 3 inch shells in it just so I could say I own one.  I am sure I would not notice any loss in bag numbers had I gone that route either.  I personally feel that the 391 performed better out of the box…but I’m sure I’m wrong. HH Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> anyone got any opinions or comments on the browning gold hunter 3 1/2 inch > 12 gauge or the super black eagle benelli. > i am thinking of up grading my shotgun and can not decide.  i’ve shot the > benelli but i have not shot the browning. > thanks > Jamie

Both are fine guns.  Pick which ever one fits you the best.  If price is a concern check out the Winchester super x 2.  Same design as the Browning without the unnecessary gizmos like a magazine lock.  It’s what I am going to buy this year especially when they are priced at $650.  Also new this year is the Franchi semi-auto in a 3 1/2 inch gun.  I bought a 20 gauge 620VS two years ago and think it is the best valued gun out there.  I am not sure on the price of the 3 1/2 inch guns, but the 3 inch ones sold for as low as 550.  They are imported by Benelli USA and come with 5 choke tubes. Very simple and effective gas system, adjustable stock shims for fit, and light weight.  Sorry if your not interested in these others but I always see the Browning vs Benelli thread come up often and your answers will likely be along the same lines as a Chevy, Ford, Dodge truck comparison.  Most people are biased away from the actual facts by what they own IMO.  Good luck, Ed Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I know a guy that owns both Browning and Binelli.  He doesn’t hunt the Binelli.  I asked if I could buy it off him and he told me that he wouldn’t sell me such a piece of crap.  He suggested I take the money and get the Browning new. My $0.02 worth.

> anyone got any opinions or comments on the browning gold hunter 3 1/2 inch > 12 gauge or the super black eagle benelli. > i am thinking of up grading my shotgun and can not decide.  i’ve shot the > benelli but i have not shot the browning. > thanks > Jamie > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Jamie,   I have the Benelli and my son has the Browning, toss a coin, both are very fine scatterguns and no complaints so far either way. My suggestion is pick the one your most comfortable with and the one that fits best and go for it.  TJ Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Any opinion of the HK/FABARM 12g pump FP-6? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text —— Original Message —– Newsgroups: rec.hunting Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 4:55 PM > anyone got any opinions or comments on the browning gold hunter 3 1/2 inch > 12 gauge or the super black eagle benelli. > i am thinking of up grading my shotgun and can not decide.  i’ve shot the > benelli but i have not shot the browning. > thanks > Jamie > Both are fine guns.  Pick which ever one fits you the best.  If price is a > concern check out the Winchester super x 2.  Same design as the Browning > without the unnecessary gizmos like a magazine lock.  It’s what I am going > to buy this year especially when they are priced at $650.  Also new this > year is the Franchi semi-auto in a 3 1/2 inch gun.  I bought a 20 gauge > 620VS two years ago and think it is the best valued gun out there.  I am not > sure on the price of the 3 1/2 inch guns, but the 3 inch ones sold for as > low as 550.  They are imported by Benelli USA and come with 5 choke tubes. > Very simple and effective gas system, adjustable stock shims for fit, and > light weight.  Sorry if your not interested in these others but I always see > the Browning vs Benelli thread come up often and your answers will likely be > along the same lines as a Chevy, Ford, Dodge truck comparison.  Most people > are biased away from the actual facts by what they own IMO.  Good luck, Ed > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/ Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>anyone got any opinions or comments on the browning gold hunter 3 1/2 inch >12 gauge or the super black eagle benelli. >i am thinking of up grading my shotgun and can not decide.  i’ve shot the >benelli but i have not shot the browning. >thanks >Jamie >Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >        http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

In regards to the commentary on the Winchester Super X2….  take a look at the American Rifleman for this month.  Mark O’Keefe had a fairly decent write-up about it.  It might help. Personally, I favor pumps, and the Browning BPS at that. Matt Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> anyone got any opinions or comments on the browning gold hunter 3 1/2 inch > 12 gauge or the super black eagle benelli. > i am thinking of up grading my shotgun and can not decide.  i’ve shot the > benelli but i have not shot the browning. > thanks > Jamie >Both are fine guns.  Pick which ever one fits you the best.  If price is a >concern check out the Winchester super x 2.  Same design as the Browning >without the unnecessary gizmos like a magazine lock.  It’s what I am going >to buy this year especially when they are priced at $650.  Also new this >year is the Franchi semi-auto in a 3 1/2 inch gun.  I bought a 20 gauge >620VS two years ago and think it is the best valued gun out there.  I am not >sure on the price of the 3 1/2 inch guns, but the 3 inch ones sold for as >low as 550.  They are imported by Benelli USA and come with 5 choke tubes. >Very simple and effective gas system, adjustable stock shims for fit, and >light weight.  Sorry if your not interested in these others but I always see >the Browning vs Benelli thread come up often and your answers will likely be >along the same lines as a Chevy, Ford, Dodge truck comparison.  Most people >are biased away from the actual facts by what they own IMO.  Good luck, Ed

In addition, as the Win. is the same design as the Browning, I would take a look at the American Rifleman write-up of the Win. X2 by Mark O’Keefe.  He had quite a few nice things to say about it. Personally, I shoot a Browning BPS and wouldn’t trade it.  I’ve never been a fan of autos since the service (M-16’s and M-60’s).  But, the Browning Golds and Win.’s are beautiful guns.  Kinda miss the days of the Auto-5’s, though. Good Hunting! Matt Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> My $0.02 worth.

How about your .04 cents. Both guns are great guns. You will not be dissatisfied with either. I own a Benelli and Many Browning’s. It seems like Browning’s always perform well. I have never had a problem with my Benelli. I have shot over 2 thousand shells through it without problems. I also have a shaw custom slug barrel for it. Will shoot 1" or less at 100 yards. It is unbelievable being the slug is .5 already. Usually the holes are touching, unless I flinch…often!.  I bough the gun used. I have no idea how much he has shot the thing. It was well taken care of. The Beretta 391 is also an awesome gun. I see allot of people at our club shoot them for sporting clays. scott Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

help w/shotgun & rifle combo

Question:

  I’ve got the Baikal in 12 ga over .308 win. and I found it allot of gun for the money. The choke tubes all shot to the same point, extraction on the rimless .308 is 100%. Accuracy was reasonable. The sites needed no adjustment on mine for 100 yards, and the impact point for the shotgun barrel was right on for 40 yards with the same setting on the sites, so it’ll make a great turkey gun.  I tried trap and singles skeet with the appropriate chokes, and did only slightly poorer than the guns I have specifically for those sports. The sites weren’t the handicap on flying targets that I worried they might be.   My only complaints are too heavy and creepy trigger pull, and the comb of the stock isn’t high enough to alline the eye with the sites quickly. I’ll be building up the comb to fix that, and will have a look at the guts of the gun to see what needs to happen to cure the creepy trigger pull. The front trigger fires the upper barrel, most two trigger guns have the front firing the lower barrel, so I may swap the triggers around so I instinctively know which trigger for which barrel.   If I had to do it over, I’d get it with the rifle barrel in a rimmed cartridge, it’d be easier to use in a break open gun like this than the rimless ones are. The extractor has quite hefty up pressure on the case to ensure positive extraction on the rimless cartridge, something that NEF and Thompson Center have failed to do with the guns I had (both guns were quickly sold off for that reason). The up pressure makes removing the case a little more difficult than I’d like, and would be unnecessary on a rimmed cartridge. Good fishing, Matt Moore Visit Matt’s Severum World at: http://www.virtualseeds.com/matt.html Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

i would agree with you but i havent been able to fire any of these rifles. i only know of crossfire making the only other shotgun & rifle combo but they’re too expensive.    i’m leaning towards the CZ 584 but i’m hearing good reviews for the Baikal. > I’d say you’re looking at the "workaday" end of the range there. > Certainly you could use your Baikal to hammer in fence posts, jack up > the truck and play softball. > I’m sure to get flamed but none have a reputation for being at the > accuracy end of the spectrum. > Pete

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> i’m looking for a shotgun-rifle combo and i was wondering if anyone has any > feedback from experience > Savage 24F in 12 ga & 30/30

    I have two Savage Model 24F 20 gauge & 22 long rifles and one 24F 20 gauge & 22 magnum.  Both my sons will be given one after they pass their hunter safety courses when they’re old enough.  They are great for small game hunting.  The one I use is very accurate.  I had to have the trigger pull lighten by a gunsmith because it was terrible from the factory.  The other guns don’t have this problem because they’re older.  I don’t have any experience with the 12 gauge & 30/30 but if they’re anything like the 20 gauge & 22 rifle I don’t think you’ll be disappointed. Ron Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> i’m looking for a shotgun-rifle combo and i was wondering if anyone has any > feedback from experience.   i’m looking at 3 models right now <snip>  CZ 584, EAA/Bakial, Savage.

I’d say you’re looking at the "workaday" end of the range there. Certainly you could use your Baikal to hammer in fence posts, jack up the truck and play softball. I’m sure to get flamed but none have a reputation for being at the accuracy end of the spectrum. Pete www.the-proof-reader.co.uk LIBERTY & LIVELIHOOD – Have you registered yet? www.march-info.org Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

i’m looking for a shotgun-rifle combo and i was wondering if anyone has any feedback from experience.   i’m looking at 3 models right now CZ 584 in 12 ga. & 30-06 EAA/Bakial IZH 94 in 12 ga & 30-06 Savage 24F in 12 ga & 30/30 all help appreciated Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> i’m looking for a shotgun-rifle combo and i was wondering if anyone has any > feedback from experience.   i’m looking at 3 models right now > CZ 584 in 12 ga. & 30-06 > EAA/Bakial IZH 94 in 12 ga & 30-06 > Savage 24F in 12 ga & 30/30

– I own the Baikal O/U in 12/308 and have been impressed by it.  It’s on the heavy side, but I like the pistol-style iron sights, it balances well, and it locks up solidly.  Using the iron sights and Federal Premium ammo with 180-gr Nosler Partitions, I’ve been able to achieve between one and 1.5-inch groups slightly below point of aim at 50 yards (which suggests it might be close to dead on at 100 yards).  And after learning to look past the iron sights, hitting flying clays wasn’t a problem either.  I think they’re a great value for the money and are better made than the Savage 24s I’ve seen. Given the quality of other CZ products, I imagine it’s pretty good as well, but I have no experience with them. — Eric Ching Ching Sling and Ching Ring Designer Defensive Pistolcraft, Mountain View, CA "The pen is mightier than the sword…except in a swordfight." "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."  – Sigmund Freud, A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis, 1952 Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response: