King Holiday, and 2000 Election
Question:
Ummm, idiot boys, could you please stop cross posting your pathetic crap far and wide? I’m sure Floridians and Chicagans have their own moronic twits to laugh at without you adding to the pile. tim gueguen 101867
Response:
<snippage of unnecessary words of a bigot> > But I’d rather address a different aspect of MLK’s legacy- the "Voter > Rights act of 1965." > This law was passed following the "Civil Rights" disturbances > organized > by King and others in Selma Alabama. > For another view of what happened, please click > on:http://www.amren.com/article1.htm
I checked out the American Renaissance site and found it to be a thoroughly racist garbage pit. I went there because I was curious about what comments would be made regarding the Selma demonstrations. I was not surprised, given the nature of the site, that the article opposed the demonstrations and the resulting Voting Rights Act. I was further not surprised to note that the article sought only the testimony of Alabama state troopers and other police officers. However, I was absolutely amazed at the emphasis on the allegedly overt sex, and particularly sex between partners of different races, as if that somehow undermined the validity of the demonstrations and the march. Here’s the truth: It did not undermine anythng because it did not happen!!! I can’t say that no one had sex during those days, but I can promise you that sex was rare among marchers in Selma and Montgomery for two reasons: 1. there was nearly no privacy and, 2. marchers and volunteers were invariably exhausted at the end of each day. How do I know this? Because I was there! I never had sex with anyone and I never saw anyone having sex, white. black, brown, yellow or red. The article gives short schrift to the murder of Viola Liuzzo, but she and I were among a small group of people who had brought their cars to Selma. We were quickly put into service carrying marchers, food and other supplies up U.S. route 80 from Selma to the march encampments. I spent nights in the encampments and in the Brown Chapel and, again, never saw any behavior other than that of tired people sleeping. Viola was killed after the march was all over. Most of us stayed in Montgomery that night, but she had to collect some gear in Selma and gave a black man a ride. The black man rode in the front seat with her and that alone was enough of a provocation to three KKK members who either happened upon them, or as I believe, were actively hunting for people like them, to blow Viola away with a shotgun. The three were later discovered to be members of another three letter organization: the FBI! The final march into Montgomery was something to behold. The article discounts the numbers present, but there were easily 50,000 people, black and white, stretching down Dexter Avenue from the state house, with thousands more forced to stand in side streets for lack of room. It was an amazing day, and influenced the Congress to affirm the right to vote for _all_ American people, not just the powerful and bigoted. Sadly, that right is under fire 35 years later when black people have been cheated out of their right to vote in Florida. If John Ashcroft is confirmed as Attorney General, their rights will no doubt be further abrogated. Next time you cite a site, check out the facts. <further snippage of grossly distorted facts and ideas>
Response:
> As each year passes, more and more people begin to question the idea of > having an annual holiday to honor Martin Luther King. > Many agree that this holiday should be rescinded because of MLK’s: > plagerism and fraud, association with known Communists, and personal > degeneracy that included embezzlement of SCLC funds to provide himself > with prostitutes and liquor, and sexual harassment of female subordinates.
MLK was a real degenerate, but perhaps he is the perfect negro leader. David Souder – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> This is all well documented, and much more information of these topics > can be found at http://www.mlking.org. > In fact, most apologists for King don’t deny the truth- they simply > insist that King was Politically Correct person, that none of this > matters. > But I’d rather address a different aspect of MLK’s legacy- the "Voter > Rights act of 1965." > This law was passed following the "Civil Rights" disturbances organized > by King and others in Selma Alabama. > For another view of what happened, please click > on:http://www.amren.com/article1.htm > The "Voter Rights Act" abrogated the 10th Amendment, and took away the > right of the states to require voters to meet certain qualifications, > such as being able to read and write. > Over the years, virtually all qualifications for voters have been > eliminated. Instead of actually having a place of residence where > one intends to vote, bums can register to vote at soup kitchens. > No one even has to be a citizen, as any effort to detect non- > citizens that are registed to vote is called "racist." > The consequences of such foolishness became obvious during the aftermath > of the 2000 election. > Blacks, Jews, and a few others claimed that they meant to vote for Gore, but > were too stupid to follow simple instructions, or even to ask for > assistance. > Democrats protested that the election was somehow "unfair," because some > blacks were given cards, telling them which numbers to punch, but they > screwed up and told them to punch Buchanan’s number instead of Gores’s, > and of course the blacks were too stupid to simply read a name and > follow an arrow. (one would think some blacks would consider themselves > insulted by the Democrats, and proabably there are a few that do) > What’s more ridiculous than allowing people to vote on initiatives, that > they can’t read? > Of course in California, when voters overwhelmingly passed Prop. 209, to > eliminate governmental affirmative action, opponents of the measure sued > to have it thrown out, claiming, among other things, that since it was > Prop. 209 was called the California Civil Rights Initiative, that black > and hispanic voters were too stupid to read it, (it was one of the shortest > initiatives in history) and voted for it, even though they were in favor > of affirmative action. > It’s time for the "Voter Rights Act of 1965," and the holiday in honor > of the one who did much to pass it to go! > Regards, > HM > Web Resources: >
