Today's Articles

Winchester Model 100?

Question:

Hadn’t heard that one, but you would be well to consider a Remington 7600 or Browning BAR. — John Dickmon http://www.benefit4kids.org http://www.sportsmenagainsthunger.org http://www.pathwai.org

> I was considering purchasing a Winchester Model 100, 308 caliber, > semi-automatic in excellent condition from private individual.  However, I > visited a gunshop to ask about this gun and was told that there was a > serious firing pin problem and the guns had been recalled for re[pair. The > shop owner also referred to it as the Model 100 jam-o-matic, saying this was > a problem gun all around.  Anyone with any experience on this? > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> I was considering purchasing a Winchester Model 100, 308 caliber

I've owned a couple of M100s, one in .308 and one in .284.  Both gave good reliability and reasonable deer-hunting accuracy when kept clean and fed factory ammunition.  I wouldn't pick one as my sole deer-rifle.   .   .I think there are too many better choices out there.  .  .but I wish I still had either or both of my M100s, if only for the neat historical value. Best, Hank Jackson Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

 The guy at the gun shop wants to sell you a gun of his. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> All in all I believe the mod 100 to be a great gun.  I would >recomment it to anyone!

It is indeed a fine, accurate rifle. Randy Wakeman Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

  The > shop owner also referred to it as the Model 100 jam-o-matic, saying this was > a problem gun all around.  Anyone with any experience on this?

    I have owned a couple of 100's.  They have been very reliable and I have experienced few jams.  The problem of the recalled firing pin is easily taken care of by any good gunsmith.  All in all I believe the mod 100 to be a great gun.  I would recomment it to anyone! Al Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I have 2 friends who both hunt with a Winchester 100 in .243 Win. and they have nothing but praise for the gun.  I have hunted with them both and never seen a problem.  I beleive the firing pin problem can be cured (if it already hasn't) with a retrofit on the defective part.  The only real problem I've seen with these guns is the availability of extra magazines.  If it comes with a couple, then no problem.  My 2 cents.

> I was considering purchasing a Winchester Model 100, 308 caliber, > semi-automatic in excellent condition from private individual.  However, I > visited a gunshop to ask about this gun and was told that there was a > serious firing pin problem and the guns had been recalled for re[pair.  The > shop owner also referred to it as the Model 100 jam-o-matic, saying this was > a problem gun all around.  Anyone with any experience on this? > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

-- Posted from a010-0732.hawi.splitrock.net [209.254.53.224] via Mailgate.ORG Server – http://www.Mailgate.ORG Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I was considering purchasing a Winchester Model 100, 308 caliber, semi-automatic in excellent condition from private individual.  However, I visited a gunshop to ask about this gun and was told that there was a serious firing pin problem and the guns had been recalled for re[pair.  The shop owner also referred to it as the Model 100 jam-o-matic, saying this was a problem gun all around.  Anyone with any experience on this? Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

What went wrong.

Question:

"Head on" is a tough shot.  On that size of a deer, the chance of it being just a few degrees off from head on is big.  My son shot his first doe in a similar situation.  The bullet did strike very near the aim point, but ran along the rib cage under the sholder blade and exited at the diaphram. This was a 243 w/ 100 gr. Grand Slam bullets.  She ran off, but stopped within my sight, if I stood up.  My son was too short to see her over a small rise, so I finished her. I don’t know if a 7mm-08 would exit or not.  I shot a large doe at 10 yards w/ a 7mm Rem Mag w/ 162 gr bullett and it didn’t exit.  She didn’t go anywhere though!  I don’t recommend this, makes field dressing a little revolting… If the deer isn’t spooked, a head-on shot will usually improve to broad-side if you can wait. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>7mm-08 is an awesome deer gun.  I’ve owned two, loved both, >and been very effective with ‘em…..The cartridge you’re >shooting with the bullet you chose sure isn’t the problem. >It’s user error of some sort.

I’ve got to agree, the cartridge/bullet combo is so well-proven that there is absolutely no question as to its ability on deer-sized game. While it is hard to admit to not placing the bullet where you wanted, and that’s not what the poster wants to hear, it still remains the best explanation.  A low shot just above the sternum inside the rib cage and into the paunch isn’t going to drop many deer at the shot, and the broken leg could have been hit when either too far forward or back ( as the leg swung in stride ). More than once I’ve been positive of the hit as I shot, only to find the animal with the bullet not quite where I thought.  Lots can happen between the brain’s command and the bullet’s impact – and little of that is good. Jay T Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>Last weekend on the Wisconsin opener I shot a 1 1/2 year old buck (about 110 >lbs).  (plus one in the shoulder blade)…… but he kept running. >My questions. >Is a 7mm/08 not enough gun?

I killed two blacktail with a 7-08 this year.  Both were one-shot kills. First was a spike uphill angling away a little at about 75 yards; the bullet went in behind the right shoulder and came out in front of the right shoulder up high.  The deer deer spun, dropped, and died.  The second was a nice 3-pt (8 eastern count) buck that I hith through the back of both lungs at about 50 yards.  He ran about 100 yards.  I think if I’d hit him even an inch further to the front he’d dropped in 25 yards; I only went through the back "lobes" of the lungs. >Is the Federal Premium 140 gr Nosler Partition not the right bullet?

It is a great bullet, although a little tougher than necessary for deer I think.  FWIW, I was shooting Partitions in the above examples, although they were 150’s (my rifle won’t shoot 140’s well, which is too bad).  But yes, it is the right bullet, or at least one of them! >Did the bullet blow up on contact?

No. >Did the bullet just punch a 7 mm hole through?

I bet the frontal shot actually penetrated the lenght of the deer or close to it.  The shoulder shot broke whatever bones it hit and also passed through, would be my guess.  The front half of a partition expands pretty quickly… it shouldn’t have just made 7mm hole in either case.  On my spike, the exit hole was about an inch in diameter, and on the 3-pt it was about 1.5 inches; obviously the bullet did not expand that big so I guess it was bone chunks or debris that blew through along with the bullet. I don’t know what happened, but you were using an excellent deer caliber (one of the best IMHO) and an excellent bullet… -jeff Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->7mm-08 is an awesome deer gun.  I’ve owned two, loved both, >and been very effective with ‘em…..The cartridge you’re >shooting with the bullet you chose sure isn’t the problem. >It’s user error of some sort. > I’ve got to agree, the cartridge/bullet combo is so well-proven that > there is absolutely no question as to its ability on deer-sized game. > While it is hard to admit to not placing the bullet where you wanted, > and that’s not what the poster wants to hear, it still remains the > best explanation.  A low shot just above the sternum inside the rib > cage and into the paunch isn’t going to drop many deer at the shot, > and the broken leg could have been hit when either too far forward or > back ( as the leg swung in stride ). > More than once I’ve been positive of the hit as I shot, only to find > the animal with the bullet not quite where I thought.  Lots can happen > between the brain’s command and the bullet’s impact – and little of > that is good.

Jay, I am starting to think the blood trail ended where I would have found foot prints.  Ie someone is eating my venison sausage. I think you are right.  The first shot was low.  The second I am still sure was good.  Saw the blood spot grow on his shoulder as he ran.  What burns my but far more than someone eating my deer is not knowing for sure. Especially on the shoulder shot. Well, at least I know the caliber and bullet are considered a good fit for deer.  Now I can use all the frustration on extra practice at the range. Thanks Henry Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Last weekend on the Wisconsin opener I shot a 1 1/2 year old buck (about 110 > lbs).  Would have been the first one with the new rifle.  35 yard head on > shot centered between the leg about 5 " up from the brisket.  Can’t verify > the hit but at 35 yards I would need strong proof  to believe I was off by > more then 2".  He took off running and at about 50 yards I hit him square in > the sholder blade (about 1/3 of the way up in the body).  That leg stopped > working and I could see my hit, but he kept running. > Weak blood trail from the first to the second hit.  Found bone fragments at > both locations.  Blood trail kept getting better as I followed it. After > 500 yards it just stopped.  No deer but there was a recently vacated ground > blind 60 yards from the last blood. > I have taken the head on chest shot before with a 12 guage foster slug. > Boom and the deer dropped, struggled for a couple of seconds and it was > over.  The broadside sholder shot is of course text book. > My questions. > Is a 7mm/08 not enough gun? > Is the Federal Premium 140 gr Nosler Partition not the right bullet? > Did the bullet blow up on contact? > Did the bullet just punch a 7 mm hole through? > Henry > 7mm-08 is an awesome deer gun.  I’ve owned two, loved both, and been > very effective with ‘em.  I handload that same 140 grain partition and it works > great for me.    The partitions seem to expand nicely at 7mm-08 velocities > and it’s impossible to blow ‘em up with that cartridge. > I’d suggest the second shot went low and only hit the leg, possibly the bottom > of the chest, but never even got close to the heart or lungs.  I’ve seen that > happen. > I’d suggest the first shot went lower than you think.  Was the deer below you, > or > at your level, but standing on a slope facing downhill toward you?   It would be > very easy with the bullet hitting only 5" above the bottom of the chest, or > especially > if you shot just a bit low, for a bullet hitting that region to rake down > through the > brisket and exit the body without encountering vital organs. > It sounds a whole lot like either you don’t know how to sight your gun in, it > got > dropped and the sights got knocked out of alignment, or you got a bad case > of buck fever.   The cartridge you’re shooting with the bullet you chose sure > isn’t the problem.   It’s user error of some sort. > Tom

Tom, The gun was shooting fine that day (me also I would expect).  The second shot which was about 50 yards was easy to see the point of impact because a small red spot formed and continued to get larger (for the second or so I could see) as the deer ran. The first shot could have been off.  It wouldn’t likely have been a shoulder shot as the deer was running with all 4 legs until the second shot.  I think it was likely low.  I was about 40 feet above with the height of the tree stand and the slope I was on.  I probably hit the brisket.  A lot of bone fragments and not much blood at that spot. The deer ran about 300 yards with the last 200 showing some really good blood.  I think the reason I did not find the buck was the 40 minute wait (being a bowhunter I usually wait 30 minutes) and someone else found him before I did.  He made it that far due to the adrenilin (Sp?) in his system. I know he heard me reposition on the stand and was likely all pumped up before the first shot. I should have waited for a broadside for the 1st shot.  That was my big mistake.  And next time I will not wait more than about 10 minutes (if I think the shot is good). Thanks for the comments. Henry Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Last weekend on the Wisconsin opener I shot a 1 1/2 year old buck (about 110 lbs).  Would have been the first one with the new rifle.  35 yard head on shot centered between the leg about 5 " up from the brisket.  Can’t verify the hit but at 35 yards I would need strong proof  to believe I was off by more then 2".  He took off running and at about 50 yards I hit him square in the sholder blade (about 1/3 of the way up in the body).  That leg stopped working and I could see my hit, but he kept running. Weak blood trail from the first to the second hit.  Found bone fragments at both locations.  Blood trail kept getting better as I followed it.  After 500 yards it just stopped.  No deer but there was a recently vacated ground blind 60 yards from the last blood. I have taken the head on chest shot before with a 12 guage foster slug. Boom and the deer dropped, struggled for a couple of seconds and it was over.  The broadside sholder shot is of course text book. My questions. Is a 7mm/08 not enough gun? Is the Federal Premium 140 gr Nosler Partition not the right bullet? Did the bullet blow up on contact? Did the bullet just punch a 7 mm hole through? Henry Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Last weekend on the Wisconsin opener I shot a 1 1/2 year old buck (about 110 > lbs).  Would have been the first one with the new rifle.  35 yard head on > shot centered between the leg about 5 " up from the brisket.  Can’t verify > the hit but at 35 yards I would need strong proof  to believe I was off by > more then 2".  He took off running and at about 50 yards I hit him square in > the sholder blade (about 1/3 of the way up in the body).  That leg stopped > working and I could see my hit, but he kept running. > Weak blood trail from the first to the second hit.  Found bone fragments at > both locations.  Blood trail kept getting better as I followed it.  After > 500 yards it just stopped.  No deer but there was a recently vacated ground > blind 60 yards from the last blood. > I have taken the head on chest shot before with a 12 guage foster slug. > Boom and the deer dropped, struggled for a couple of seconds and it was > over.  The broadside sholder shot is of course text book. > My questions. > Is a 7mm/08 not enough gun? > Is the Federal Premium 140 gr Nosler Partition not the right bullet? > Did the bullet blow up on contact? > Did the bullet just punch a 7 mm hole through? > Henry

7mm-08 is an awesome deer gun.  I’ve owned two, loved both, and been very effective with ‘em.  I handload that same 140 grain partition and it works great for me.    The partitions seem to expand nicely at 7mm-08 velocities and it’s impossible to blow ‘em up with that cartridge. I’d suggest the second shot went low and only hit the leg, possibly the bottom of the chest, but never even got close to the heart or lungs.  I’ve seen that happen. I’d suggest the first shot went lower than you think.  Was the deer below you, or at your level, but standing on a slope facing downhill toward you?   It would be very easy with the bullet hitting only 5" above the bottom of the chest, or especially if you shot just a bit low, for a bullet hitting that region to rake down through the brisket and exit the body without encountering vital organs. It sounds a whole lot like either you don’t know how to sight your gun in, it got dropped and the sights got knocked out of alignment, or you got a bad case of buck fever.   The cartridge you’re shooting with the bullet you chose sure isn’t the problem.   It’s user error of some sort. Tom Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Savage tactical rifle

Question:

Well, its a little heavy for me to want to tote around all day, but might be a good stand rifle. I thought of  getting one as a coyote rifle here. I have always gotten very good accuracy from the savage rifles. me

> Hi folks, new to this newsgroup and have a question on a rifle I might get, > it is a Savage tactical in a 300 Win Mag. > does anybody her have any comments good or bad about this particular > firearm?? > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Hi folks, new to this newsgroup and have a question on a rifle I might get, >it is a Savage tactical in a 300 Win Mag. >does anybody her have any comments good or bad about this particular >firearm?? >Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >        http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

I have two savage tact, 223 and 30-06.  Both are very accurate. Both triggers have been replaced or worked  on. You might consider getting a SS model if they make one. Benny Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

heavy and do not try to regulate them, it is useless. I have tactical in Win 308. With hand loads it shoots well below 1 inch on 100 yrs. Today i received a new TIMNEY trigger and i will try to install it.There is also a second guy who makes accesories ( barrels and triggers) for Savage but i was unable to contact him on line. If you have a little bit deeper pocket maybe you should try with JEWEL trigger but iam not sure whether they make triggers for Svage. Regards, PZL 24 Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Hi folks, new to this newsgroup and have a question on a rifle I might get, it is a Savage tactical in a 300 Win Mag. does anybody her have any comments good or bad about this particular firearm?? Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>Hi folks, new to this newsgroup and have a question on a rifle I might get, >it is a Savage tactical in a 300 Win Mag. >does anybody her have any comments good or bad about this particular >firearm??

I had a Savage Tactical in .308 that was a very accurate rifle.  The finish will rust easily in wet conditions, and the trigger is not so good, and mine kicked like hell for a .308 (maybe it didn’t fit me well?),  but it was an accurate rifle. -jeff Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Clean Shot and Clear Shot Powder

Question:

Has anybody tried either of these new powders? Are they measured the same as Black Powder or Pyrodex? Mark Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>Has anybody tried either of these new powders? Are they measured the same

as Black Powder or Pyrodex? >Mark

Tried Clear Shot this year in a Thompson Center Renegade .54.  Cleaning was much easier and residue easily removed to reload in the field.  Better accuracy with Clear Shot than I had in the past with FFG blackpowder which produced better accuracy than Pyrodex RS in the past.  365 Grain Maxi-balls over 110 grains of powder provide good accuracy with both Clear Shot and blackpowder in this rifle.  Unfortunately I ran into ignition problems while hunting with this load.  Number 11 caps (which were several years old) resulted in a few misfires.  Unfortunately they occured when the rifle was pointed at mule deer bucks.  The primers were CCI No 11 and several years old.  I later tried Dynamit Nobel No 1075 at the range and did not have any misfires.  A friend using an in-line with shotgun primers had no ignition problems.  I intend to use Clear Shot again in the future for hunting if I can verify that the ignition problem was old caps and not more difficult ignition of the powder.  The Clear Shot is measured by volume as is blackpowder.  GOEX discusses Clear Shot on their website. Irv Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

What ever powder you use it will clean up better with GLASS PLUS That’s right the window cleaner will clean blackpowder guns slicker than anything you have ever used. Throw away all those expensive BP solvents and get Glass Plus. WW Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> Has anybody tried either of these new powders?

Ive used Clear Shot in my 38-55. While it doesnt seem to attack the barrel/etc it for sure will attack brass. Within 30mins of firing the brass started turning green. I also wouldnt try using it in small pistol cases as the fouling is extreme and very difficult to remove even as recommended (cool water). OTOH in a rifle with a long barrel there is very little fouling which cleans up pretty quick. I suspect youd get comparable results with a muzzle loader. >Are they measured the same as Black Powder or Pyrodex?

Yes, if youre loading by volume.                                 HTH jimg Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

What ever powder you use it will clean up better with GLASS PLUS That’s right the window cleaner will clean blackpowder guns slicker than anything you have ever used. Throw away all those expensive BP solvents and get Glass Plus. WW>>>>>>>>> I have heard that and planned to try it when I get my new gun this Xmas. What do you use for rust prevention after you clean witht the glass plus? Does’nt Glass Plus have amonia in it? Could this cause rust? Mark Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text —— Original Message —– Newsgroups: rec.hunting Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:22 AM > Has anybody tried either of these new powders? Are they measured the same as Black Powder or Pyrodex? > Mark > Mark  I just purchased clean shot pellets 50 gr equivelant to pyrodex and black powder by volume. My experience with pyo was its as dirty (fouling) as BP. So I will try this out at .23 a pellot. > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/ Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> What ever powder you use it will clean up better with > GLASS PLUS > That’s right the window cleaner will clean blackpowder guns slicker than > anything you have ever used. Throw away all those expensive BP solvents and > get Glass Plus. > WW>>>>>>>>> > I have heard that and planned to try it when I get my new gun this Xmas.

What do you use for rust prevention after you clean witht the glass plus? Gun oil as always. >Does’nt Glass Plus have amonia in it?

Nope. It’s ammonia free. Could this cause rust? Nope. WW Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

question about a rifle

Question:

    Hi, I am contemplating bying my first rifle.  After looking at many rifles, in various price ranges, I have begun to seriously look at the British Enfield rifle.  I am attracted to the enfield because i like the way it looks and handles.  I have not yet fired one, and was wondering if I should get a .303 or a .308?  Does anyone have any knowledge or experience they would be willing to share?  I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks in advance, Pat Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I dont have too much knowledge in this, but the first question that popped in my head is what will you be hunting???? I bought a SHR 970 http://www.sigarms.com/products/sanswiss-shr970.asp and so far I love it

>     Hi, I am contemplating bying my first rifle.  After looking at many > rifles, in various price ranges, I have begun to seriously look at the > British Enfield rifle.  I am attracted to the enfield because i like the way > it looks and handles.  I have not yet fired one, and was wondering if I > should get a .303 or a .308?  Does anyone have any knowledge or experience > they would be willing to share?  I would greatly appreciate it. > Thanks in advance, > Pat > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>    Hi, I am contemplating bying my first rifle.  After looking at many >rifles, in various price ranges, I have begun to seriously look at the >British Enfield rifle.  I am attracted to the enfield because i like the way >it looks and handles.  I have not yet fired one, and was wondering if I >should get a .303 or a .308?  Does anyone have any knowledge or experience >they would be willing to share?  I would greatly appreciate it.

I hunted with a .303 Lee Enfield Mark III* for many years.  It’s still a serviceable deer rifle as long  as you get it checked out by a professional ’smith before firing it.  If the little locking guide on the rear of the bolt is chipped or broken, for instance, they can discharge unexpectedly.  There are other unobvious potential problems, and I really do recommend expert examination.  Most of them are over 50 years old, after all. But if you get a good one that’s been well cared for I see no reason why you shouldn’t be able to shoot it for at least another 50 years. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Pat, If you have your heart set on the Enfield, go for it.  Just get the .308, the ammunition is more readily available than .303. — http://www.herefishyfishy.com The Official Website of the ROFBMP Northwoods Classic http://www.uglybass.com/rofbmp Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Pat, The single most important consideration is what do you want to use it for? One of the great things about having so many different kinds of rifles in so many calibers is you can pick the one that matches your particular needs the closest. No one but you can determine the best fit. There are many that can help guide you to your best choice, but only knowing some key info about your intended use. For instance, is this strictly for fun, target practice, hunting and if so what kinds of game at what ranges in what kind of habitat, or for more serious competition shooting or self defense? The more detail you give, the better the answers back to you will be. Good luck! Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Goatweed or twigs, affect bullet???

Question:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hello > I shot at a deer last week and missed. It was standing in some tall goatweed > and I wanted to know if that would affect the bullet? I was shooting a 308, 150 > gr. soft point Remington core-lokt. I was told that it should just bust through > it, but wanted to hear some other opinions. The rifle is sighted in as I took a > hog the day before. It was in an open field. > I ask about the goatweed because when I was around 13 years old, ten years ago. > I shot at a doe a few times with a 243. I finally hit her with the last shot, > In three places. For some reason the bullets were breaking up before they got > to her. She was standing in tall grass, but it wasn’t really thick. Was it the > grass breaking the bullets apart or something else? I don’t remember what ammo > I was using back then. Maybe 100 gr. remington soft point core-lokt. As we have > an old box of it. > Any advice would be appreciated. > Thanks > Eric Majeski

  Eric,   As a firearms instructor for many years I can assure you that ANYTHING that a bullet hits in its path WILL affect the point of impact, even a blade of grass. It my not miss the target but it will have a different POI.                       CUTTER Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> Hello > I shot at a deer last week and missed. It was standing in some tall goatweed > and I wanted to know if that would affect the bullet? I was shooting a 308, 150 > gr. soft point Remington core-lokt. I was told that it should just bust through > it, but wanted to hear some other opinions.

Hi Anything that gets in the way of a bullet in flight will affect it including grass. Anyone who tells you that a bullet will just plow right on thru must be thinking of cannon fire. It doesn’t take much to upset a bullet prior to hitting the desired target. Some shooters forget that when shooting in heavy brush and fail to see the bbl is in line with brush while their scope is above it and they can’t figure out why they are missing easy shots. I’ve had it happen as close as 25 yards while shooting a .30 cal with 180gr bullets. Been hunting for over 50 years and a high power competitor for 40. Ol Shy & Bashful  The rifle is sighted in as I took a – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> hog the day before. It was in an open field. > I ask about the goatweed because when I was around 13 years old, ten years ago. > I shot at a doe a few times with a 243. I finally hit her with the last shot, > In three places. For some reason the bullets were breaking up before they got > to her. She was standing in tall grass, but it wasn’t really thick. Was it the > grass breaking the bullets apart or something else? I don’t remember what ammo > I was using back then. Maybe 100 gr. remington soft point core-lokt. As we have > an old box of it. > Any advice would be appreciated. > Thanks > Eric Majeski > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

In my 30+ years of hunting experience, I have found that game standing just the other side of the brush can usually be hit. However if the brush is several feet toward you from the game, don’t even take the shot. David Heinsohn Texas – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hello Eric,   Hate to bust a bobble: there is no such thing as a bush bucking > bullet!!!   Even the .50 Browning (700 gr. bullet) at about 2800 fps will be > deflected by some very small brush and twig.  I have seen them turn completely > sideways after hitting some brush.  And, they didn’t fly very true after that, so > hitting behind the brush is very unlikely.  Have to find a hole in the brush to > shot through.  The .243 shots flat enough to shot through a hole.  Good hunting, > Joe > I shot at a deer last week and missed. It was standing in some tall goatweed > and I wanted to know if that would affect the bullet? I was shooting a 308, 150 > gr. soft point Remington core-lokt. I was told that it should just bust through > it, but wanted to hear some other opinions. The rifle is sighted in as I took a > hog the day before. It was in an open field. > I ask about the goatweed because when I was around 13 years old, ten years ago. > I shot at a doe a few times with a 243. I finally hit her with the last shot, > In three places. For some reason the bullets were breaking up before they got > to her. She was standing in tall grass, but it wasn’t really thick. Was it the > grass breaking the bullets apart or something else? I don’t remember what ammo > I was using back then. Maybe 100 gr. remington soft point core-lokt. As we have > an old box of it. > Any advice would be appreciated. > Thanks > Eric Majeski > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/ > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Hello Eric,   Hate to bust a bobble: there is no such thing as a bush bucking bullet!!!   Even the .50 Browning (700 gr. bullet) at about 2800 fps will be deflected by some very small brush and twig.  I have seen them turn completely sideways after hitting some brush.  And, they didn’t fly very true after that, so hitting behind the brush is very unlikely.  Have to find a hole in the brush to shot through.  The .243 shots flat enough to shot through a hole.  Good hunting, Joe – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I shot at a deer last week and missed. It was standing in some tall goatweed > and I wanted to know if that would affect the bullet? I was shooting a 308, 150 > gr. soft point Remington core-lokt. I was told that it should just bust through > it, but wanted to hear some other opinions. The rifle is sighted in as I took a > hog the day before. It was in an open field. > I ask about the goatweed because when I was around 13 years old, ten years ago. > I shot at a doe a few times with a 243. I finally hit her with the last shot, > In three places. For some reason the bullets were breaking up before they got > to her. She was standing in tall grass, but it wasn’t really thick. Was it the > grass breaking the bullets apart or something else? I don’t remember what ammo > I was using back then. Maybe 100 gr. remington soft point core-lokt. As we have > an old box of it. > Any advice would be appreciated. > Thanks > Eric Majeski > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Hello I shot at a deer last week and missed. It was standing in some tall goatweed and I wanted to know if that would affect the bullet? I was shooting a 308, 150 gr. soft point Remington core-lokt. I was told that it should just bust through it, but wanted to hear some other opinions. The rifle is sighted in as I took a hog the day before. It was in an open field. I ask about the goatweed because when I was around 13 years old, ten years ago. I shot at a doe a few times with a 243. I finally hit her with the last shot, In three places. For some reason the bullets were breaking up before they got to her. She was standing in tall grass, but it wasn’t really thick. Was it the grass breaking the bullets apart or something else? I don’t remember what ammo I was using back then. Maybe 100 gr. remington soft point core-lokt. As we have an old box of it. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks Eric Majeski Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Pheasant Hunt in Stockton

Question:

> Got a chance to do a little pheasant hunting this year in California, near > Stockton. A few years ago, the hunt was OK but not spectacular. Anybody > out there getting their limits? I don’t feel like going through the hassle > of flying across state borders with a weapon these days unless it’s worth > it.

Greetings. If your post doesn’t get other response, I suggest you call the CA department of fish & game in Sacramento & ask to talk with an upland bird biologist. I’ve had good luck with these folks being accessable, friendly and knowledgeable (probably about the specific area you have in mind). For pheasant, I’ve been a denizen of the local game bird club for the last several years, so I can’t offer first hand observations on the wild birds. My second-hand sense from the talk around the range, the bird club & the sports shop is that you’ll probably find the situation similar to what it was a few years ago. Not worse, but no great strides ahead either. I’m optomistic as groups like Pheasants Forever can have fairly quick impact with a few tweaks to the handling of the habitat, but I don’t think we are near critical mass for those changes in CA yet. On another front, my son and I travelled to Wyoming from CA (and back) a couple of weeks ago for an antelope hunt and did not experience unusual inconvenience for the prescence of firearms & gear. My experience is that you can probably bring your shotgun out and decide about the hunt upon arrival without major hassles. Good luck & enjoy the hunt/Jim Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Got a chance to do a little pheasant hunting this year in California, near Stockton. A few years ago, the hunt was OK but not spectacular. Anybody out there getting their limits? I don’t feel like going through the hassle of flying across state borders with a weapon these days unless it’s worth it. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

New women hunters

Question:

I have been thinking about buying a gun and really have no idea where to start.  So I am looking for any ideas on a gun that would be easy for a woman to pack around and that is between $250.00 to $350.00. If you have any suggestions please let me know!  Thanks! Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

>I have been thinking about buying a gun and really have no idea where >to start.  So I am looking for any ideas on a gun that would be easy >for a woman to pack around and that is between $250.00 to $350.00. >If you have any suggestions please let me know!  Thanks!

 With the word "gun" you covered a *lot* of  territory. Since this is a "hunting" NG would it be reasonable to assume you mean a rifle a/o a shotgun. Though there are people who use handguns for hunting . Do you intend to go hunting or shoot a paper targets ? If you’re a complete beginner, a .22 caliber rifle of numerous brands will cost within your limits. And ammunition for one is very inexpensive. Then, if you’re talking about "packing" a handgun, that’s a whole ‘nuther subject. Worth a whole lot of discussion. About that, ask again on the newsgroup rec.guns      Bill Van Houten (USA Ret)  "No matter how hard you try, you can’t throw a potato chip very far." "Linus" Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

It would help if you could be a bit more forthcoming on what your intended use is.  Hunting covers a very wide range of critters, and there are classes of game, that require different weapons for best use. Birds require a shotgun, shall game should be taken with rimfire type weapons, and big game sizes are so varied, that selecting a weapon is problematic without more information.  I would be glad to help, if you could narrow down the perameters a bit.         I live far out in the alaskan bush, and my wife and I both hunt on occasion when the need arises. —   Bruce (semiretired powderman & exFCC Field Inspector for Southeastern Alaska)   Bruce Gordon * Debora Gordon R.N.       Bruce’s Trading Post         P.O. Box EXI                      Excursion Inlet South      Juneau, Alaska 99850               Excursion Inlet, Alaska 99850     University of Alaska           Remote Weather Data Collection Site Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> I have been thinking about buying a gun and really have no idea where > to start.  So I am looking for any ideas on a gun that would be easy > for a woman to pack around and that is between $250.00 to $350.00. > If you have any suggestions please let me know!  Thanks!

   Let us know what animals you plan on hunting, and in what type of terrain, Jess. Give us as much information as you can, and we can help better. Bob Experience is something you don’t get until just after you need it. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text —— Original Message —– Newsgroups: rec.hunting Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:50 PM > I have been thinking about buying a gun and really have no idea where > to start.  So I am looking for any ideas on a gun that would be easy > for a woman to pack around and that is between $250.00 to $350.00. > If you have any suggestions please let me know!  Thanks! You will get lots of advice so here is mine. I don’t think you should worry about the type or caliber of gun.  At first I think you should look for a rifle that fits.  Do you ware shoos that don’t fit?  How a gun fits has a lot to do with how much and how well you will enjoy shooting.  I like smaller cartridges with less recoil. (Pain) Things like Bolt, auto, 260 or 7-08 can what till you find a brand that fits. Alan Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Ear protection

Question:

> Next novice question – do you wear ear protection when out hunting?  We > do > when we are at the trap range, and we noticed that on the show "Hunting > with Hank" it appears the handler wears ear protection only on his gun > side > ear.  Is that common?  I honestly cannot recall noticing at the hunt > tests > if the gunners wear ear protection… I was too overwhelmed with my > rookie > trained and handled dog doing so well that she kept passing…  But we > are > wondering.  We keep those little foam ones in the gun case right now, and > that’s what we use at the range.

Depends on how much shooting and with what type of gun.  For big game hunting, where you would fire one shot, ideally, you can probably forget the hearing protection.  Or, you can put in one earplug, in the ear thats closest to the muzzle. This is mainly to have your sense of hearing when you are out hunting for game and you have not located it yet.  Of course, you can try and locate your game first, and if you could, put on hearing protection just before you shoot. For shotgunning at ducks/geese, you will probably have the time to put on hearing protection when you start calling them, and they get to within range. Of course, you can always get some of those ‘hearing aid’ type hearing protection <http://www.walkersgameear.com>.  This is not an endorsement, I do not work for them, nor do I receive any compensation from them. But this type of hearing protection will allow you to get a good cheek-stock weld for shooting. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Next novice question – do you wear ear protection when out hunting? We do > when we are at the trap range, and we noticed that on the show "Hunting > with Hank" it appears the handler wears ear protection only on his gun side > ear.  Is that common?  I honestly cannot recall noticing at the hunt tests > if the gunners wear ear protection… I was too overwhelmed with my rookie > trained and handled dog doing so well that she kept passing…  But we are > wondering.  We keep those little foam ones in the gun case right now, and > that’s what we use at the range.

   (snipped)   I like to wear ear protection whenever possible. I’ve lost 1/2 of my hearing now, and will never get it back. Range and target shooting, it’s mandatory. Small game and varmints, I’d recommend it, but calling turkeys, you can’t wear ‘em and be able to hear the turkeys. Use your own judgment. I sure miss those birds singing. Haven’t heard a cricket in years…… Bob Experience is something you don’t get until just after you need it. Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Hi there! Again, thanks for all your wonderful advice and suggestions so far in our entry into the world of hunting, upland bird in particular.  We still hope to have our first "real" outing next year, as all the "hunter ed classes" are full up until January. Next novice question – do you wear ear protection when out hunting?  We do when we are at the trap range, and we noticed that on the show "Hunting with Hank" it appears the handler wears ear protection only on his gun side ear.  Is that common?  I honestly cannot recall noticing at the hunt tests if the gunners wear ear protection… I was too overwhelmed with my rookie trained and handled dog doing so well that she kept passing…  But we are wondering.  We keep those little foam ones in the gun case right now, and that’s what we use at the range. Of course for the bow hunters, this may not apply as a question.  ;-) Oh and now that we have our new shotgun sized for us, it has made a huge difference in our enjoyment of shooting and in our success in hitting those silly clays.  We highly recommend getting a gun sized, especially if you are female!  Right out of the box, the stock was easily 2 or 3 inches too long for both of us.  Had to pull it as far in front of me as my arms would reach, just to even begin to plant it near my shoulder.  HUGE difference now.  Well worth the nominal (we thought) price of sizing it.  Not to mention we got a free cleaning lesson out of it as well. Good luck to all! Tracy & Jeni Olympia, Wash kibble providers to Ch. Cameo’s Wild Cherry Jubilee WDX JH , Clumber Spaniel Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

novice deer hunter question

Question:

Check for fresh tracks at the water.  In my area, hunting water only works when it’s very dry and the number of water sources are limited.  Right now, there is water everywhere, so no one source is much better than any of the others. Look for tree rubs, ground scrapes, trails w/ fresh tracks and fresh droppings.  Absent any sign, look for "funnels" to deer travel if you’re limited to the area where you hunt. Our "body count" on our 700 acre farm stands at 17 for this year, well toward the goal of 25! Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

Preparation is the single most important factor in any hunting. – The deer may be pressured into using other areas for escape when there is pressure from other hunters (within 7 miles!). – Is the area you are talking about close to a feeding site – their kitchen?  They do most of their feeding in the night or low light conditions. – Hoe visible are you to the deer?  ANY movement in the grass will be like a fire alarm in the woods.  You need to think ambush.  Unseen, unheard, unscented. Go to: http://gameandfish.about.com/library/weekly/blmn_index.htm?iam=dpile&… to learn more. I would reccommend getting out of the path, behind something – out of their natural awareness areas.  Remember deer walk around with their nose to the ground alot. Good luck Scott > I hunted today for the first time not in a stand.  Here’s the situation: > There was thick woods, then 75 yards of tall grass before a wattering hole. > I saw some trails to the hole but no droppings.  If facing the woods the wind > was to my face, so I hunkered down in the grass halfway between the woods > and the water and watched the tree line.  It was shotgun only, so distance > was a factor.  I didn’t see any deer.  What would you guys have done in this > situation?  Did I pick the right place to park myself, or did I mess up? > Thanks! > Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at: >         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I just tagged my first one this week, so I am no expert.  But one thing I have been told is that if you have the wind in your face, to scout into the wind to see if a better area is available, and if worse comes to worse to retreat downwind back to your original spot.  As for me, I just happened to walk upon mine.  All the acorn scent, grunts, rattlers, and doe scent didn’t do me squat! LOL Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

I hunted today for the first time not in a stand.  Here’s the situation: There was thick woods, then 75 yards of tall grass before a wattering hole. I saw some trails to the hole but no droppings.  If facing the woods the wind was to my face, so I hunkered down in the grass halfway between the woods and the water and watched the tree line.  It was shotgun only, so distance was a factor.  I didn’t see any deer.  What would you guys have done in this situation?  Did I pick the right place to park myself, or did I mess up? Thanks! Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response:

> I hunted today for the first time not in a stand.  Here’s the situation: > There was thick woods, then 75 yards of tall grass before a wattering hole. > I saw some trails to the hole but no droppings.  If facing the woods the wind > was to my face, so I hunkered down in the grass halfway between the woods > and the water and watched the tree line.  It was shotgun only, so distance > was a factor.  I didn’t see any deer.  What would you guys have done in this > situation?  Did I pick the right place to park myself, or did I mess up? > Thanks!

You obviously know about the importance of playing the wind.  But how was the cover you were hiding in.  Deer comming to a water hole, especially one with a change from woods to water around it will stop to observe before steping from the woods.  The older deer will likely approach from downwind. Sitting just inside the woods about 40 yards off the trail downwind of the water hole would be a good idea.  It is possible since you were on the upwind side of the waterhole that the deer downwind were smelling you, and you were not looking in that direction so you didn’t see them. I am getting more and more certain that having the wind directly in your face is a bad idea,  quartering into your face is better.  Deer walking upwind (their perferred method) will not wind you.                   |                  /   wind direction                   s   sign you are hunting over (the place you expect to see deer example water hole.)          y you .          +      d   deer sneaking in using the wind.          +       .        +++     . Henry Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:         http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Response: